考研复试是考生在通过初试的基础上，对考生业务水平和实际能力的进一步考察，考研如果没过的话是可以调剂的。下面有途网小编跟大家说说如何考研调剂，希望对你有帮助。
不能参加考研调剂的情况
一.未过国家线
1.B区没过，这种情况肯定是没法考研调剂的
2.过了B区未过A区，可考研调剂B区，不可调A区
3.总分过线，单科受限。(若专业课分数较高，可申请破格，但难度较大。)
二.专硕考研调剂学硕
一般而言专硕是不能考研调剂学硕的。(部分专硕由于公共课考的和学硕一样是可以考研调剂的)
ps：学硕考研调剂专硕也是必须要过专硕线的。
三.调入专业与报考专业差别大，无相关性
调入专业与报考专业差别较大，没有相关性，比如考生的报考院校是文学，但是想考研调剂到工学类专业，是不可行的。
ps：一般专业课类似或相同，都是可以考研调剂的。但统考科目一般要求相同，具体以相关学校的要求为准。
小编推荐：考研十大没出路的专业
四.七个专业不能调
工商、公共、旅游、工程、会计、图书情报、审计专硕，不得调入其他专业，其他专业考生也不得调入以上7个专业。
ps：这几个专业是可以相互考研调剂的。
五.法硕非法学
其他专业的考生不得调入法硕(非法学)专业，法硕(非法学)专业的学生也不能调入其他专业。
六.少数民族骨干计划
参与“少数民族骨干计划”的考生不得考研调剂到该计划以外录取，未报考的考生不得参与考研调剂到该计划录取。
七，强军计划、援藏计划
参加单独考试含强军计划、援藏计划的考生不得参加考研调剂。
2017年考研英语一阅读理解真题及答案【最新完整版】
Text 4
In a rare unanimous ruling, the US Supreme Court has overturned the corruption conviction of a former Virginia governor, Robert McDonnell. But it did so while holding its nose at the ethics of his conduct, which included accepting gifts such as a Rolex watch and a Ferrari automobile from a company seeking access to government.
The high courts decision said the judge in Mr. McDonnells trial failed to tell a jury that it must look only at his official acts, or the former governors decisions on specific and unsettled issues related to his duties.
Merely helping a gift-giver gain access to other officials, unless done with clear intent to pressure those officials, is not corruption, the justices found.
The court did suggest that accepting favors in return for opening doors is distasteful and nasty. But under anti-bribery laws, proof must be made of concrete benefits, such as approval of a contract or regulation. Simply arranging a meeting, making a phone call, or hosting an event is not an official act.
The courts ruling is legally sound in defining a kind of favoritism that is not criminal. Elected leaders must be allowed to help supporters deal with bureaucratic problems without fear of prosecution for bribery. The basic compact underlying representative government, wrote Chief Justice John Roberts for the court, assumes that public officials will hear from their constituents and act on their concerns.
But the ruling reinforces the need for citizens and their elected representatives, not the courts, to ensure equality of access to government. Officials must not be allowed to play favorites in providing information or in arranging meetings simply because an individual or group provides a campaign donation or a personal gift. This type of integrity requires well-enforced laws in government transparency, such as records of official meetings, rules on lobbying, and information about each elected leaders source of wealth.
Favoritism in official access can fan public perceptions of corruption. But it is not always corruption. Rather officials must avoid double standards, or different types of access for average people and the wealthy. If connections can be bought, a basic premise of democratic society-that all are equal in treatment by government-is undermined. Good governance rests on an understanding of the inherent worth of each individual.
The courts ruling is a step forward in the struggle against both corruption and official favoritism.
36. The undermined sentence (Para.1) most probably shows that the court
[A] avoided defining the extent of McDonnells duties.
[B] made no compromise in convicting McDonnell.
[C] was contemptuous of McDonnells conduct.
[D] refused to comment on McDonnells ethics.
【答案】[C] was contemptuous of McDonnells conduct.
37. According to Paragraph 4, an official act is deemed corruptive only if it involves
[A] leaking secrets intentionally.
[B] sizable gains in the form of gifts.
[C] concrete returns for gift-givers.
[D] breaking contracts officially.
【答案】[C] concrete returns for gift-givers.
38. The courts ruling is based on the assumption that public officials are
[A] justified in addressing the needs of their constituents.
[B] qualified to deal independently with bureaucratic issues.
[C] allowed to focus on the concerns of their supporters.
[D] exempt from conviction on the charge of favoritism.
【答案】[A] justified in addressing the needs of their constituents.
39. Well-enforced laws in government transparency are needed to
[A] awaken the conscience of officials.
[B] guarantee fair play in official access.
[C] allow for certain kinds of lobbying.
[D] inspire hopes in average people.
【答案】[B] guarantee fair play in official access.
40. The authors attitude toward the courts ruling is
[A] sarcastic.
[B] tolerant.
[C] skeptical.
[D] supportive
【答案】[D] supportive
